SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MANJU AGGARWAL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
PARSVNATH DEVELOPER LTD. & ANR. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: MR. R.C. SHARMA
For the Respondent:

ORDER

(PER MR. JUSTICE RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA), PRESIDING MEMBER)

1.      Heard Mr. Kunal Garg, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Prabhakar Tiwari, Advocate, for the opposite parties. 

2.      Manju Aggarwal and Anuj Aggarwal have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.4962390/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund, out of which Rs.500000/- is payable by opposite party-2; (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iii) pay Rs.80000/-, as litigation costs; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. The complainants stated that Parsvnath Developers Limited (opposite party-1) was a company, registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of development and construction of group housing project. Opposite party-1 launched a group housing project in the name of “Parsvnath Royale” at village Kundi, Sector 20, Panchkula, Haryana in the year, 2006 and made wide publicity of its amenities and facilities. Real Pro Assets Limited (opposite party-2) was a real estate broker. Believing upon the represe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top