Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PREM NARAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
MANOJ AGGARWAL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
ORRIS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of complaints regarding possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. initial classification of complaints for refund and possession. (Para 9) |
| 3. discussion on prior judgments and claims. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. arguments regarding force majeure and contractual obligations. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. court's assessment of breaches and obligations. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. final ruling on refunds and compensation due. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER
These consumer complaints have been filed by the complainants Manoj Aggarwal & others who are the allottees of the project “Greenopolis” situated in Sector 89, Gurgaon alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. &anr. As the complaints have been filed with more or less similar prayers against the same opposite parties, therefore, they are being decided together.
CC 2009/2017
2. The brief facts of the case are that Complainants booked an apartment in August 2012 in OP’s project “Greenopolis” for total consideration of Rs.1,02,93,719/-. Through allotment letter dated 21.08.2012, apartment no. 204 on 2nd floor in Tower-15 having a super area of 1957 Sq. Ft
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
