NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ROHIT BHAYANA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M/S. D.L.F. HOME DEVELOPERS LTD. – Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Pinaki Misra, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. Rohit Bhayana and Tanveer Bhayana have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) direct the opposite party to hand over the possession of the flat to the complainant in the “Primus” Sector 82-A, Gurgaon (Haryana) with all facilities and amenities as agreed to be provided by the opposite party in a time bound manner, (ii) direct the opposite party to pay compensation to the complainant on account of delay in handing over possession of the flat which was to be handed over on 22.08.2015 @12% per annum on the amount deposited by them till the flat is not handed over; (iii) declare that the complainant is not liable to pay Rs.180000/- towards cost of increase in area for additional super area of 30 sq. ft. interest, to pay Rs.171709/- as demanded by the opposite party towards reimbursement of proportionate charges paid/payable by the company for, bulk supply of electric energy, for creating infrastructure and installation @Rs.65.89 per sq.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.