Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
R.K. AGRAWAL, CJ, M. SHREESHA, J
DEEPAK AGARWAL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
THREE C SHELTERS PVT. LTD. & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaints regarding delayed possession of flats. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposite parties' claims regarding consumer status and construction delay. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. complainants' request for refund and comparison with past cases. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments on force majeure and delays impacting construction. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. disputes around construction timelines and related contractual obligations. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. legal basis for compensation due to delays. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. opposite parties' arguments concerning construction delays and financial issues. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. court observations on consumer rights after delays. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. court's final views on compensation and interest. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 10. conclusion on refund and interest awards. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 11. final order for refund and compensation. (Para 36) |
ORDER
R.K. AGRAWAL, J. PRESIDENT
1. These Consumer Complaints, under Section 21 read with Section 12 (1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), have been filed by the Complainants, the allottees of Residential Flats/Apartments in a project, namely, “Greenopolis” (for short
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
