Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, PRESIDING MEMBER, MR. BHARATKUMAR PANDYA, MEMBER
PRIYANSHU SURI & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
M/S. AIMS PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the complaint by multiple allottees. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the housing project and allegations of delay. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion of contract clauses related to possession. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court observations on completion status and validity. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. determination of compensation and application of interests. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. final orders on compensation and future actions. (Para 12) |
ORDER
1. Heard Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Advocate, for the opposite parties.
2. Initially Priyanshu Suri and 14 others (9 sets of the allottees in “Aims Golf Avenue”) have filed above complaint for directing the opposite parties to (i) deliver possession of the flats allotted to them, complete in all respect as per specifications along with basic amenities and facilities as per agreement after obtaining ‘full occupancy certificate’ and ‘completion certificate’ and execute title deed/sub-lease deed within stipulated period; (ii) revoke illegal demands and invalid offer of possession and issue fresh offer of possession after obtaining ‘full occupation certificate’; (iii) not to charge extra amount in the hea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
