NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. JUSTICE RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, PRESIDING MEMBER, DR. INDER JIT SINGH, MEMBER
NIKITA DHINGRA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M/S. JASMINE BUILDMART PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainants seek construction completion and financial relief due to delays. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court directs refund with interest for failure to deliver the property. (Para 4) |
| 3. opposite party contests consumer status and claims defaults by complainants. (Para 8) |
| 4. court emphasizes planned timelines and consumer rights in construction agreements. (Para 9) |
1. Heard Mr. Arun Khosla, Advocate, for the complainant.
2. Ms. Nikita Dhingra & Vinod Kumar Dhingra(the complainants) have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) complete the construction of the project “Provence Estate” as per specification, obtain “completion certificate”, handover possession and execute conveyance deed in her favour within six months, or alternatively, hand over the task of the completing project to a renowned Architect/Civil Contractor and the opposite party be directed to handover, relevant drawings/documents and necessary fund to him or alternatively, direct the opposite party to refund entire amount deposited by her with interest @24% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund, (ii) pay interest @24% compounded quarterly on her deposits
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.