NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
R.K. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT
VEENA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
DLF UNIVERSAL LIMITED & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer lodged a complaint for delayed apartment possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. developer claimed force majeure concerning construction delays. (Para 6 , 10) |
ORDER
R.K. AGRAWAL, J. PRESIDENT
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed by the Complainant under Section 21 (a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) against the Opposite Party, M/s. DLF Universal Limited (hereinafter to be referred to as “the Developer) seeking vacant physical possession of the booked Apartment and compensation on account of delay in handing over the possession.
2. It has been, inter alia, averred in the Complaint that in the year 2010, the Developer launched a Group Housing Project, namely, “DLF Capital Greens”,to be constructed on a land admeasuring approximately 31.15 acres situated at DLF Capital Greens – Phase III at 15, ShivajiMarg, New Delhi-110015.
3. Swayed with the impressive publicity by the Developer in the Media and the assurances given by them, the Complainant booked an Apartment in the above said Project of the Developer on 30thNovember, 2010 and paid the registration/booking amount of ₹15,38,625/-. The total sale consideration of the Apartment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.