NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MAYANK KUMAR & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M/S. D.L.F. HOME DEVELOPERS LTD. – Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Pinaki Misra, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. Mayank Kumar and Nilima Jaiswal have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) handover the possession of the flat allotted to them, complete in all respect with all facilities and amenities; (ii) pay delay compensation in the form of interest @12% per annum on their deposit from due date of possession till the date of handing over possession; (iii) declare that the complainants are not liable to pay Rs.142025/- towards cost of increase in super area of 19 sq. ft., Rs.119788/- towards charges for bulk power supply, creating infrastructure and installation, Rs.413195/- towards other costs, Rs.12377/- towards gas piping charge, Rs.97195/- towards Value Added Tax as contingency deposit, Rs.119443/- towards escalation charges, Rs.918107.21 as service tax; (iv) to refund Rs.1695000/- with interest @18% per annum; (v) declare that the complainants are not liable to take electricity connection through the opposite party; (vi) pay Rs.1000000/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.