1. Heard Mr. Rajat Gupta, Advocate, for the Jaipur Development Authority, Mr. Mukul Kumar, Advocate for the Jaipur Nagar Nigam and Mr. Umesh Nagpal, Advocate for the respondents/complainants.

2. On the death of Naresh Kumar Verma respondent 1/1, his legal heirs have filed IA/8339/2021 in FA/619/2015 and IA/8340/2021 in FA/1704/2016 for substituting them in the array of parties. IAs are allowed and their names are substituted.

3. Both above appeals have been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan at Jaipur dated 01.5.2015 passed in CC/53/2012 whereby the complaint has been allowed and the appellants were directed to handover possession of a plot admeasuring 266.66 sq. yards in their development scheme in Jaipur in coordination with each other and pay compensation of Rs.10/- lacs each of them to the complainant and litigation cost of Rs.25000/-.

4. Rajesh Verma/respondent-1 filed CC/53/2012 for directing the opposite parties to handover possession of a developed plot admeasuring 266.66 sq. yards in any existing scheme and pay compensation of Rs.70/- lacs and litigation cost of Rs.50000/-.

5. The complainant stated that Jaipur Urban Improve