Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE V.K. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
MEHUL BHARATKUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
M/S. BELLISSIMO CROWN BUILDMART PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaints regarding residential flats. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. jurisdiction determined by total consideration. (Para 4) |
| 3. aggregate value and compensation define pecuniary jurisdiction. (Para 5) |
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1924 OF 2018
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that she has instruction to withdraw the appeal. Dismissed as withdrawn.
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1923 & 1925 OF 2018
First Appeal No.1923/2018 is directed against the order of the State Commission dated 04.09.2018 whereby a consumer complaint instituted by the appellant against the respondent company was dismissed solely on the ground that the State Commission did not have pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the consumer complaint. Being aggrieved from the order passed by the State Commission the complainant/appellant is before this Commission by way of this appeal.
First Appeal No.1925/2018 is directed against the order of the State Commission dated 04.09.2018 dismissing the consumer complaint instituted by the complainant/appellant on the very same ground i.e. that the State Commission did not have pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the consumer complaint.
2. In the consumer co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
