Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
C. Viswanath, PM, Justice Ram Surat Ram Maurya, M
M/S. JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DN KHURANA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. proceedings arose from delayed possession of flat. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments concerning refund obligations amidst insolvency. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. assessment of financial relations under the code. (Para 11 , 20) |
1. Heard Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Sumeet Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant and Mr. Sankalp Mehrotra, Advocate, for respondents-1 to 3, Mr. Mayank Singh, Advocate, for respondent-4. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate argued as an intervener, on legal issue.
2. Jaiprakash Associates Limited (opposite parties-1 & 2) has filed above appeal from the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, dated 12.07.2019, passed in CC/66/2017, partly allowing the complaint with cost of Rs.10000/- and directing the appellant to return Rs.4578008/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of actual payment, to the complainants.
3. The office has reported 4 days delay in filing the appeal. The appellant has filed IA/16782/2019, for condonation of delay. Cause shown is sufficient. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
4. D.N. Khurana, Mrs. Prem Khurana and Konark Khurana (resp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
