Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, PRESIDING MEMBER
VINOD PREMCHAND ROHIDA – Appellant
Versus
M/S. SKODA AUTO INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and hearing details of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of appellant's claims regarding car fire incident. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents' defense on claims and allegations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court observations and findings on vehicle performance. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. application of 'res ipsa loquitur' and related principles. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 6. assessment of liability and expert evidence. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. final verdict on compensation and award. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
1. Heard Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Advocate, for the appellant, Mr. Vipin Singhania, Advocate, for respondent-1 and Mr. Siddharth Sachar, Advocate, for respondent-2, through video conferencing.
2. This appeal has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, at Nagpur, dated 19.11.2015, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 09 of 2008, whereby the complaint was dismissed.
3. Vinod Premchand Rohida (the appellant) filed Consumer Complaint No. 09 of 2008, for directing M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. and Navnit Cars Private Ltd. (the respondents) to pay Rs. one crore as compensation within reasonable period, failing which they may be directed to pay interest @ of 2% per
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
