Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
A. P. SAHI, PRESIDENT
DEFENCE CITY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
WG. CDR. VIVEK M. BHARAMBE & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts establishing parties involved and appeal details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding service of notices and ex-parte proceedings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 26) |
| 3. court's observations on procedural fairness and service of notice. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. legal principles regarding ex-parte orders and responsibility of directors. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 5. final conclusion dismissing the appeals. (Para 45) |
ORDER
1. These appeals were presented with a condonation of delay application and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the delay was condoned in all the appeals and they were directed to come up after exchange of pleadings for being heard on merits. The order dated 28.08.2023, shall form part of this order as well. While allowing the condonation of delay applications, the following observations were made in paragraph-17 to 22:
“17. Having considered the submissions raised, it appears that this appeal was entertained and on 27.03.2023, notices were issued and an interim Order was passed that till further Orders, the proceeding pending before the State Commission in Execution shall remain stayed.
18. This is how the delay condonation Applications alongwith the appeals h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
