Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. DINESH SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER, MR. JUSTICE KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE, MEMBER
OMEGA PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MR. SACHIN INGLE & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. multiple appeals arising from delay in possession claims. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding builder's responsibility for delays. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 11 , 14) |
| 3. the court's observations regarding builders' duties and consumer rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 13) |
| 4. court's ruling on the adequacy of compensation for delay. (Para 12) |
| 5. final decision and directives regarding appeal modifications. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
1. These six (06) appeals no. 45, no. 46, no. 47, no. 48, no. 49 and no. 50 of 2019 have been filed under Section 19 of The Consumer Protection Act , 1986 in challenge to the Orders (06 nos.) dated 11.12.2018 of the State Commission in complaints no. 293, no. 295, no. 296, no. 297, no. 298 and no. 299 of 2017.
Mr. Vikas Gupta, learned counsel appears for the builder co. (the appellant in all six (06) appeals).
Mr. Nilesh S. Parte, learned advocate appears on behalf of Mr. S. B. Prabhavalkar, learned counsel for the complainants (the respective respondents no. 1 and no. 2 in all six (06) appeals). He submits that he is making his submissions on instructions.
Appeals no. 45 of 2019; no. 46 of 2019, no. 47 of 2019, no. 48 of 2019, no. 49 of 2019 a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
