NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SRI. RAMESH CHANDER MAHER – Appellant
Versus
SRI. SARBASWAR BHYUAN – Respondent
ORDER
The matter was passed over. 2. On the second call also none is present on behalf of the appellant . 3. Present appeal has been received by post on 20.1.2012. 4. It was listed before this Commission for admission hearing on 20.1.2012. Since, none was present on behalf of the appellant on that day, notice was ordered to be issued to the appellant for today. 5. Notice issued to the appellant has been duly served by Regd. AD post. However, there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant. 6. Appellant has also sent an application by post for appointment of amicus curiae. 7. No ground is made out for appointment of amicus curiae in this case. 8. We have perused the record of this case. 9. Grievance of appellant is that respondent/opposite party while working as Executive Engineer of Baripada Electric Division had inflected irreparable cause by disconnecting the Electricity to his house, forcing him to remain in dark from December, 2003 to April, 2008. It has caused damages amounting to Rs.26,65,000/-. 10. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cuttack (for short as tate Commission dismissed the complaint, vide impugned order dated 14.10.2011, observing as under; lleging defi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.