SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 47

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SRI. RAMESH CHANDER MAHER – Appellant
Versus
SRI. SARBASWAR BHYUAN – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: IN PERSON
For the Respondent:

ORDER

The matter was passed over. 2. On the second call also none is present on behalf of the appellant . 3. Present appeal has been received by post on 20.1.2012. 4. It was listed before this Commission for admission hearing on 20.1.2012. Since, none was present on behalf of the appellant on that day, notice was ordered to be issued to the appellant for today. 5. Notice issued to the appellant has been duly served by Regd. AD post. However, there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant. 6. Appellant has also sent an application by post for appointment of amicus curiae. 7. No ground is made out for appointment of amicus curiae in this case. 8. We have perused the record of this case. 9. Grievance of appellant is that respondent/opposite party while working as Executive Engineer of Baripada Electric Division had inflected irreparable cause by disconnecting the Electricity to his house, forcing him to remain in dark from December, 2003 to April, 2008. It has caused damages amounting to Rs.26,65,000/-. 10. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cuttack (for short as tate Commission dismissed the complaint, vide impugned order dated 14.10.2011, observing as under; lleging defi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top