R. K. AGRAWAL, J., PRESIDENT

1. These two First Appeals by M/s. Mitsubishi Motors Corporation, Opposite Party No.3 in the Complaint (Appellant in First Appeal No. 564 of 2019/Respondent No.4 in First Appeal No.581 of 2019) and M/s. Hindustan Motors Finance Corporation Ltd., Opposite Party No.5 in the Complaint (Appellant in First Appeal No.581 of 2019/Respondent No.4 in First Appeal No.564 of 2019), are directed against the Order dated 13^th December, 2018 passed by Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, ‘the State Commission’) in Complaint No.709 of 2016. By the impugned Order, the State Commission has partly allowed the Complaint filed by the Complainant/Respondent No.1 in both these Appeals and directed the Opposite Party Nos.1, 2, 3, and 5 to, jointly and severally, refund a sum of ₹10,12,500/- being 50% of the price of the vehicle in question along with compensation of ₹1,00,000/- for mental agony and ₹50,000/- as litigation expenses. The Order was to be complied by them within 45 days of receipt of a copy of the Order failing which the awarded amount was to carry interest @9% p.a. from the date of Order till the date of refund. Opposite Party No.4, Tata