NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. DHANANJAY WAGH – Appellant
Versus
RENUKA JAYBHAYE & 3 ORS. – Respondent
ORDER
1. These two First Appeals (FAs) have been filed by the Appellants under section 19 of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 25.11.2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Aurangabad, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in Consumer Complaint (CC) no 28 of 2015, inter alia praying for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 25.11.2016. Respondent-1 and Respondent-2 herein were complainants and Respondent-3 was OP-1 in the said CC. Respondent-1 is the mother of Respondent-2. FA 228 of 2017 & FA 774 of 2017 have been filed by the appellants, who were OP-3 and OP-2 respectively before the State Commission in the said CC. As both the Appeals have been filed against the same order of the State Commission, parties involved are the same, and issues for consideration/determination are related, these are being taken up together under this order. However, for the sake of convenience, First Appeal (FA) No. 228 of 2017 is treated as the lead case and facts enumerated herein under are taken from FA 228/2017. Notice was issued to the Respondent(s) in both the FAs on 17.02.2017 and 12.05.2017 respectively. Parti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.