Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MRS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA, PRESIDING MEMBER
M/S. CITI GREEN FARMS (P) LTD. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
RISHIKESH BORKOTOKY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed under specific consumer protection laws. (Para 1) |
| 2. condonation of delay application filed, explaining four-year delay based on lack of notification and communication. (Para 2 , 3 , 10) |
| 3. the appellant's negligence in informing the commission about address changes and its attorney's duties impact appeal rights. (Para 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 4. supreme court's guidance on condonation, emphasizing that delay must be fully explained. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 5. delay reasoning must comply with standards set by legal precedents. (Para 7) |
The present Appeal, under Section 51(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for short “the Act”) has been filed by the Appellant against the order dated 07.11.2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore, Karnataka (for short “the State Commission”) in Complaint No.131 of 2013 whereby the Complaint of the Respondent was allowed.
2. Since the present Appeal has been filed with a delay of about four years, an application IA No.7246 of 2020 has also been filed. Arguments on this application for condonation of delay are heard.
IA 7246 of 2020 (condonation of delay)
3. Vide this application, the Appellant has sought condonatio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
