2024 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 1429
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
FIRST APPEAL NO. 867 OF 2020
(Against the Order dated 28/01/2020 in Complaint No. 748/2019 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. TRICITY MEDIA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. AND ANOTHER
THE TRICITY MEDIA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. REGD. OFFICE SCO NO. 545, SECTOR 70, MOHALI.
S.A.S NAGAR
PUNJAB
2. PRESIDENT, THE TRICITY MEDIA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD,
REGISTERED OFFICE AT SCO 545, SECTOR 70,
MOHALI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. AMIT MAHAJAN
AMIT MAHAJAN S/O SH. RAMESH CHANDER, R/O HOUSE NO. 3073, SECTOR 20-D, CHANDIGARH.
CHANDIGARH
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 689 OF 2021
(Against the Order dated 20/04/2021 in Complaint No. 918/2019 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. TRICITY MEDIA CO-IPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.
SCO NO.545, SECTOR-70, MOHALI,PUNJAB
1. LAL CHAND & 2 ORS.
S/O SH. RAM CHAND, R/O HOUSE NO.1629,HIG, GROUND FLOOR, SECTOR-70, MOHALI, PUNJAB
2. MEET INDER SINGH
PRESIDENT OF THE TRICITY MEDIA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.SCO-545, SECTOR-70, MOHALI,PUNJAB
3. ARVINDE JAGGA
GENERALL SECRETARY OF THE TRICITY MEDIA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.SCO-545, SECTOR-70, MOHALI,PUNJAB
FIRST APPEAL NO. 808 OF 2021
1. LAL CHAND
S/O. MR RAM CHND R/O. H NO 1629 (HIG) GROUND FLOOR, SECTOR 70
MOHALI
PUNJAB
1. TRICITY MEDIA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. & 2 ORS.
SCO 545, SECTOR 70
MOHLI
2. MEET INDER SINGH
PRESIDENT OF THE TRICITY MEDIA CO OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. SCO 545, SECTOR 70
3. ARVIND JAGGA , GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE TRICITY MEDIA CO OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOIETY LTD
FIRST APPEAL NO. 868 OF 2020
(Against the Order dated 19/02/2020 in Complaint No. 870/2019 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. TRICITY MEDIA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. AND OTHERS
THE TRICITY MEDIA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. REGD. OFFICE SCO NO. 545, SECTOR 70, MOHALI.
1. KULWINDER KAUR
KULWINDER KAUR W/O MR. IQBAL JEET SINGH, R/O H. NO. 382-B, SECTOR 43-A CHANDIGARH.
BEFORE:
 
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA,PRESIDING MEMBER
HON'BLE BHARATKUMAR PANDYA,MEMBER
FOR THE APPELLANT :
Dated : 09 July 2024
For the Petitioner: MR. A. TEWARI, RAKESH TALUKDAR,REGINALD VALASAN,VIREN SIBAL & MS. ELIZA BAR
For the Respondent:
ORDER
For Tricity Media Cooperative : Mr. D. V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate
House Building Society Limited : Mr. Vikas Kuthiala, Advocate
For Amit Mahajan : Mr. Vivek Gupta, Advocate
: Mr. Deeraj Mahajan, Advocate
For Kuwinder Singh : Mr. Ritesh Khare, Advocate
For Lal Chand : Mr. Praveer Singh, Advocate
Pronounced on: 09.07.2024
JUDGEMENT
1. Heard Mr. D. V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Vikas Kuthiala, Advocate, for the Tricity Media Cooperative House Building Society Limited, Mr. Vivek Gupta, Advocate, for Amit Mahajan, Mr. Ritesh Khare, Advocate, for Kulwinder Singh and Mr. Praveer Singh, Advocate, for Lal Chand.
2. The Tricity Media Cooperative House Building Society Limited has filed FA/867/2020 (against the order dated 28.01.2020 passed in CC/748/2019), FA/868/2020 (against the order dated 19.02.2020 passed in CC/870/2019) and FA/689/2021 (against the order dated 20.04.2021 passed in CC/918/2019) of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, allowing the complaints and directing the appellant society to deliver possession of the plots allotted to the complainants and pay delay compensation or in alternative, to refund their money with interest @12% per annum, from the date of deposit till the date of payment, and compensation for mental agony and harassment. Lal Chand has filed FA/808/2021 (against the order dated 20.04.2021 passed in CC/918/2019) as his payments vide receipts EX C-3, EX C-5, EX C-8 and EX C-10 have been disbelieved and he also prayed for additional litigation cost.
3. The office has reported that FA/867/2020 is 267 days time barred. The appellant has filed IA/4597/2021, for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The office has reported that FA/868/2020 is 273 days time barred. No application for condonation of delay has been filed in FA/868/2020. The office has reported that FA/689/2021 is 28 days time barred. The appellant has filed IA (not numbered), for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The office has reported that FA/808/2021 is 158 days time barred. The appellant has not filed any application, for condoning the delay in filing FA/808/2021.
As Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition No.3 of 2020, waived the limitation from 15.03.2020 till 29.05.2022 due to pandemic Covid-19 as such all the appeals are treated as filed within limitation.
4. The Tricity Media Cooperative House Building Society Limited (the society) was a cooperative housing society, registered under the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, basically formed by media professionals for the purposes of providing developed residential plot to its members in Mohali. The society obtained 25 acres land in Sector 113, Mohali for developing residential plots of the sizes of 200 sq. yards, 300 sq. yards and 500 sq. yards. Tentative cost of developed plot was fixed at @Rs.9000/- per sq. yard. However, final cost had to be determined after obtaining permission for change of land use. At initial stage, the members were required to deposit 10% of the tentative cost of their plot by 25.01.2011, 20% by 25.02.2011, 30% by 25.03.2011 and 40% by 25.05.2011. Allotment of the plot in each category had to be made by lottery draw, after development. The vintage plot had to be charges slightly higher rate than the other plots. It was decided that till May, 2011, permission for ‘change of land use’ would be obtained and development process would be started.
5. Amit Mahajan filed CC/748/2019 for directing the society to (i) handover possession of a developed residential plot of 200 square yard, in Sector 113, SAS Nagar, Mohali; or in alternative (ii) refund his money with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund; (iii) pay Rs.300000/- as litigation costs; and (iv) any other relief, which is deemed fit in the facts of the case. The