NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. SUBHASH CHANDRA, CJ, DR. SADHNA SHANKER, J
M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
ANITA – Respondent
ORDER
DR. SADHNA SHANKER, MEMBER
1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (corresponding section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for short “the Act”) by M/S TDI Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (hereinafter referred to as the “builder company”) assailing the Order dated 19.04.2021 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Complaint No. 92 of 2017, whereby the complaint was allowed.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the builder company and learned counsel for the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainant’) and have perused the record including inter alia the impugned Order dated 19.04.2021 of the State Commission and the memorandum of appeal.
3. Although the registry has reported that there is a delay of 194 days in filing the appeal but in view of the order of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition No. 3 of 2020, the appeal is within limitation.
4. The facts, in brief, are that in the year 2006 the complainant applied for allotment of shop, for self-employment for herself and her son, in the project, namely, Radeo Drive
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.