Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, PRESIDING MEMBER, MR. DINESH SINGH, MEMBER
MRS. ANUJA CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
SHIVAM HOSPITAL & RESEARCH INSTITUTE & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. patient's prenatal care and delivery process. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of complications during childbirth. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. claims of negligence by medical personnel. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. opposite parties' defense regarding the medical procedures performed. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. legal arguments presented by both sides during the hearing. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. details of court's findings on medical standards. (Para 13 , 20) |
| 7. court's observations on the evidence and issues raised. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. legal standards for negligence and doctors' duties. (Para 16 , 24) |
| 9. court's ruling on medical negligence and the outcome of the case. (Para 19 , 21 , 22 , 28) |
| 10. final decision and dismissal of the complaint. (Para 29) |
PER DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, PRESIDING MEMBER
Emergency obstetric hysterectomy (EOH) remains an essential weapon in any Obstetrician’s armoury and it is most vital to decide the perfect time to use this weapon. EOH is generally performed as a lifesaving procedure in cases of postpartum haemorrhage, rupture uterus, morbid adhesions of placenta and uterine sepsis. On one hand, it is used as a last resort to save the lives of mothers and on the other hand women’s reproductive c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
