Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
C. Viswanath, MR, Justice Ram Surat Ram Maurya, MR
BLOCK LAND & LAND REFORM OFFICER & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
BHUPATI RANJAN MITRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of counsel and preliminary review of the proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background and grievances filed by the respondent. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on evidence and aspects of the complaint. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. issues of jurisdiction and application of law regarding deficiency in service. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. conclusion and the dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 12) |
1. Heard Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Advocate, for the petitioners.
2. Office has reported that this revision has been filed with delay of 170 days. Supreme Court has directed that as a result of imposition of lockdown in the country due to pandemic Covid-19 as well as its affect throughout the country, the delay occurred during this period is liable to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay in filing the revision is condoned. The revision shall be deemed to have been filed within time.
3. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, Circuit Bench Siliguri, dated 25.02.2020, passed in Appeal No. A-15 of 2019 (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Uttar Dinajpur at Raiganj, dated 12.12.2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
