Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA, PRESIDING MEMBER
RELIANCE NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
PUNI DAS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition challenging the legality of state commission's orders. (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. facts regarding the appeals and cost imposition. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's review of service and jurisdiction issues. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. determination of appeal dismissal based on costs compliance. (Para 8 , 9) |
The present Revision Petition, under Section 58 (1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for short “the Act”) has been filed against the three orders dated 17.12.2019, 28.08.2020 and 31.08.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Odissa (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.127 of 2019 alleging that these orders are arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction.
2. The brief facts of the case are that a Complaint had been filed by the Respondent before the District Forum. The District Forum vide its order dated 03.09.2018 allowed the Complaint ex parte against the Petitioner holding that the Petitioner had failed to appear before it despite service of notice of the Complaint.
3. The Petitioner filed Appeal No.127 of 2019 before the State Commission wherein they had challenged the order of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
