Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. INDER JIT SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER
BABULAL GUPTA THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS SMT KIRTI GOYAL W/O SH PRADEEP GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
SHANTI NAGAR GRIH NIRMAN SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of plot allocations and financial obligations. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 2. contesting the state commission's findings on limitation and authenticity. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. assessment of the authority of receipts and continuous cause of action. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's decision to recognize continuous action. (Para 14) |
ORDER
1. The present Revision Petitions (RPs) has been filed by the Petitioners against Respondents as detailed above, under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the orders dated 18.07.2013 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bhopal (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 1337 of 2011, First Appeal (FA) No. 1539 of 2011, First Appeal (FA) No. 1338 of 2011 and First Appeal (FA) No. 1538 of 2011 in which order dated 30.07.2011 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Indore (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 373 of 2008 and Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 377 of 2008 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the orders dated 18.07.2013 of the State Commission. As the issues involved in these RPs are similar, they are taken up toge
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
