SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 391

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

NEW DELHI

 

REVISION PETITION NO. 1376 OF 2015

(Against the Order dated 18/02/2015 in Appeal No. 220/2014 of the State Commission Maharastra)

1. DR. PRADEEP B. PAWAR

503, OrchidFlowerValley, Kadakpada, Kalyan (W),

Thane

Maharashtra

...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. DILIP VARYAMAL VIRMANI & 3 ORS.

Kamal Nagar, Village Cherpoli, Tal. Shahapur,

2. Vinod Kishanchand Majethia

Mumbai

3. Inder Dalamal Narsinghani

4. M/s. Sai Developers

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

&nbsp

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Nagaraj Hoskeri, Advocate

For the Respondent :

Appearance not marked

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: MR. NAGARAJ HOSKERI
For the Respondent:

ORDER

JUSTICE V.K. JAIN (ORAL)

In terms of the directions given by the  District Forum in the consumer complaint filed by the petitioner, the respondents were required interalia to obtain the requisite Occupancy Certificate and execute the conveyance deed in favour of the Society. It transpired during the course of hearing that the respondents had obtained the Completion Certificate No.168/03 dated 19.9.2003 from Group Grampanchayat, Cherpoli Bamne. The question which arises for consideration in this petition is as to whether the aforesaid Gram Panchayat was competent to issue the requisite Completion Certificate or not, on the date it was issued. When this petition was heard, on 28.4.2016, a notice was issued to the Collector of District Thane to inform this Commission as to whether Grampanchayat Cherpoli, Taluka Shahpur, District Thane was competent to approve plan on 3.10.2001 and Group Grampanchyat Cherpoli Bamne was competent to issue the Completion Certificate on 19.9.2003 in respect of the project in question. Mr. N.B. Nagargoje, Assistant Director appeared before this Commission on behalf of Collector Thane on 4.1.2017 and filed an affidavit in response to the directions given by this Commission. He also stated before this Commission that though Group Grampanchyat Cherpoli Bamne was competent to issue Completion Certificate on 19.3.2003 it should have consulted the District Town Planner before issuing the Occupancy Certificate. He further stated that they are writing to the State Govt. to regularise the aforesaid irregularity. The affidavit of Mr. N.B. Nagargoje to the extent it is relevant, reads as under:-

“5. I say that according to section 42 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, no person can change the use of agriculture land to non-agriculture without permission to Hon’ble District Collector. I say that it is necessary for village Panchayat to take permission of Hon’ble District Collector before converting any agriculture land to non-agriculture purpose. Hence Village Panchayat has to refer the matter to Hon’ble District Collector for converting agriculture land to non-agriculture purpose. Hereto annexed and marked as an Exhibit “C” is a copy of Section 42 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

6. I say that the Hon’ble District Collector while granting non-agriculture call for the reports/opinion of District Town Planner. There after the District Town Planner after scrutinizing the case according to the B&C class of rural areas, recommend the proposal to the Hon’ble  of District. Therefore before granting non-agriculture permission, NOC of Gram Panchayat being local authority is also taken. Hence I say that power to grant development permission outside Gaonthan limit remains with Hon’ble District Collector.

But after grant of N.A. order occupancy certificate mentioned in Rule No.12 of development control regulation of B and C class “Every persons erecting building shall within one month after completion of such Building, shall give written notice to the authority through qualified Architect/Engineer Supervisor regarding completion of work” and occupancy certificate is issued under Rule No.13 of said rule. Hereto annexed and marked as an Exhibit “D” is a copy of rules of development control regulation of B and C class.

Since in village Panchayat area after Grant of N.A. Permission, power to grant occupancy certificate will remain with panchayat. But since permission has been granted with prior concurrence of District Town Planner according to B and C class rule opinion of District Town Planner before granting occupancy certificate under rule No.13 has not been taken. And the same has not been seen to be taken in this present case.”

It is thus evident that as per the concerned Collector, Group Gram Panchayat Cherpoli ought to have taken the concurrence of District Town Planner before granting the Completion Certificate, which has not been done in this case. There is no evidence of the aforesaid irregularity having be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top