NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M/S. KRISHNA PARK – Appellant
Versus
SUREKHANEN MANUBHAI PATEL – Respondent
ORDER
1. These 10 Revision Petitions, bearing No. RP/1408/2022, RP/1409/2022, RP/1410/2022, RP/1411/2022, RP/1412/2022, RP/1487/2022, RP/1488/2022, RP/1489/2022, RP/1490/2022 and RP/1491/2022 were filed by M/s Krishna Park and its Partners (Hereinafter referred to as the “Petitioners”/ “Opposite Parties”) against Pinkyben & Others (Hereinafter referred to as the “Respondents”/ “Complainants”). These Revisions Petitions challenge the Orders dated 27.07.2020 in FA/682/2016, FA/683/2016, FA/694/2016, FA/695/2016, FA/699/2016, FA/664/2016, FA/667/2016, FA/674/2016, FA/679/2016 and FA/666/2016 respectively, which were passed by the learned Gujarat State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”). The State Commission had partly allowed all the Appeals. In turn, these Appeals had been filed against the order of the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surat, Gujarat (‘District Forum’, hereafter) dated 15.10.2016. Vide this order, the District Forum, had partly allowed the Complaints.
2. Since the facts and questions of law involved in all the Revision Petitions are substantially similar, except for minor var
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.