SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 682

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMARI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES
For the Respondent:

ORDER

 

PER MR SUBHASH CHANDRA

This revision petition filed under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, ‘the Act’) assails the order dated 06.12.2012 in FA no. 672 of 2012 of the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula (in short, ‘the State Commission’). This order had dismissed the appeal against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (in short, ‘the District Forum’) in CC no. 575 of 2009 dated 06.01.2010.

2.     The facts in brief, as stated by the petitioner, are that the respondent had registered on 01.12.2005 for allotment of a residential plot of 350 sq yards in the petitioner’s project named ‘TDI City’, Kundli by paying an amount of Rs.5,95,000/- by way of cheque. A time bound payment plan was agreed upon whereby the respondent was required to make periodical payments. On 15.01.2006 plot no. K 69 measuring 350 sq yards was allotted and the respondent made payments amounting to Rs.24,46,500/- against a sale consideration of Rs.27,12,500/-. It is stated by the petitioner that the respondent did not execute the Plot Buyers Agreement with the petitioner despite the admitted service of a letter dated 04.10.2007 for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top