SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
RAJESH ARORA – Appellant
Versus
SAURABH CHHABRA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: MR. VINOD K. GANDHI
For the Respondent: M/S. AKJ LAW ASSOCIATES

ORDER

PER MR SUBHASH CHANDRA

1.     This revision petition filed under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Delhi (in short, ‘State Commission’) in Appeal No. 549 of 2012 dated 26.05.2016 orders in consumer complaint no. 392 of 2010 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Janakpuri, New Delhi (in short, ‘District Forum’) dated 30.03.2012.

2.     Briefly stated, the facts of the case as stated by the petitioner are that respondent had approached the petitioner, who provides consultancy and assistance services for assistance in admission and visa services overseas, for higher education in the United Kingdom in 2009. The petitioner facilitated respondent’s admission in the London School of Business Management and his student visa application through the High Commission of UK in New Delhi. The respondent travelled to London, UK in October, 2009 and joined the said college. However, the respondent was not attending classes regularly which was reported by the college to the UK Border Agency. The respondent discontinued his education and returned to India in November 200

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top