Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PREM NARAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
INDERJEET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED & ANOTHER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner purchased a new car with defects. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. district forum ordered replacement, modified by state commission. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. debate over responsibility for faulty parts and repair obligations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court emphasized the necessity for the manufacturer to address defects. (Para 11) |
| 5. court ordered repairs and compensation to the complainant. (Para 12) |
These revision petitions have been filed by the petitioner Inderjeet Singh against the common order dated 18.04.2011 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, (in short ‘the State Commission’) passed in First Appeal No.1021 of 2009 & First Appeal No.1031 of 2009.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 11.08.2008 the petitioner purchased a new Maruti Alto car model, RF Alto having Chassis No.1192679 and Engine No.3540388. One –month after the purchase i.e. on 11.09.2008 the petitioner went for regular service but the complaint made by the petitioner about the “abnormal wobbling of the rear left side tyre” was overlooked and ignored by respondent No.2. On 17.09.2008, the petitioner again observing the same problem in the rear wheels of his car, visited th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
