Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, PRESIDING MEMBER
M/S.VAIBHAV LAXMI BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS – Appellant
Versus
LAXMIBAI CHINDUJI PURAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basics of the agreement for sale and consequent complaint. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. procedural history and appeals in consumer forums. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. explanation for the delay in filing the appeal. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. ruling on the importance of compliance with limitation periods. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. no grounds for condonation of delay established. (Para 14) |
| 6. final ruling on the dismissal of the appeal without merit. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
1. The revision petition has been filed under Section 21 (b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 , hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’, challenging the Order dated 02.09.2016 of the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nagpur Circuit Bench (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’) in the first appeal No.A/759/09 which dismissed the appeal filed by the builder co.- OP /petitioner and confirmed the order of District Forum.
2. Brief facts that the M/s Vaibhav Laxmi Builders & Developers (OP/ petitioner) agreed to sell a plot to the complainant for a consideration of Rs. 10,64,027/- vide agreement dated 01.02.2008. The payment was to be made in the installments but , on 01.02.2008 the complainant made part paym
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
