NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE V.K. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
M/S. PANKAJ TRADING COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the complainants claimed additional insurance compensation after accepting initial payments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. discharge vouchers do not eliminate claims unless proven to be obtained under coercive circumstances. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. recent rulings shape the enforceability of discharge vouchers and insurance claims. (Para 8) |
The complainants/petitioners who are traders in Tendu Leaves, had taken two insurance policies each from the respondent National Insurance Company Ltd. A fire allegedly broke out in the godown of the complainants/petitioners where Tendu leaves were stored by them. On the intimation of the loss having been given to the insurer, a surveyor was appointed to assess the loss to the complainants. Out of the two policies taken by each of the complainants, one policy was taken by them to secure the interest of the Forest Department, whereas the second policy was taken through the bank from which credit facility had been obtained by the complainants against hypothecation of Tendu leaves stock.
2. In the Consumer Complaint subject matter of RP No.2771 of 2017, the insurer made an initial payment of Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.