NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, Presiding Member, MR. DINESH SINGH, Member
NARINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. death of insured alleged due to intoxication. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. errors in forensic evidence and issues with applying policy exclusions. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. order of district forum upheld. (Para 11) |
Appeared at the time of arguments
PER HON’BLE DR. S. M. KANTIKAR, PRESIDING MEMBER
1. This revision petition has been filed under Section 21 (b) of The Consumer Protection Act , 1986 in challenge to the Order dated 15.07.2016 of the H.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short the ‘State Commission’) arising from the Order dated 12.04.2016 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solan (in short the ‘District Forum) in C.C. No. 81 of 2015.
2. No one appeared for the petitioner (the ‘complainant’).
We heard the learned counsel for the respondent (the ‘insurance co.’).
We also perused the material on record.
3. Brief facts are that the complainant’s son, the deceased insured, had taken “Jeevan Anand” policy with profits and with accident benefit. The risk covered was Rs.4,70,000/- (Rs.2,35,000/- on account of sum assured and Rs.2,35,000/- on account of accident benefit). On 08.06.2014 the insured died due to accidental drowning in river. The insuranc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.