Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, PRESIDING MEMBER
J.N. SHORI MULTI SPECIALITY HOSPITAL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
KRISHAN LAL & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the basis of the revision petition is medical negligence. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. the patient's deteriorating condition was critical on arrival. (Para 3 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. overview of appeals filed due to dissatisfaction with the lower forum's ruling. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. allegations of negligence explored against the actions of ops. (Para 8) |
| 5. court's evaluation of medical standards and practitioners' judgment in emergencies. (Para 11) |
| 6. the court emphasizes the medical judgment in emergencies and standards of care. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
1. The present Revision Petition was filed against the impugned Order dated 06.04.2012 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana (for short “State Commission” ) whereby the appeal (Appeal No. 2160/2007) filed by the appellants was dismissed.
2. Brief facts are that Smt. Kiran, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Patient’) the wife of the Complainant was under regular observation in Civil Hospital, Kalka during her pregnancy. On 15.07.2006, for labour pains she was admitted in Kalka Nursing Home at 9:00 a.m. and remained under observation of Dr. Nitasha upto 2.30 p.m. and then the patient was referred to the OP-1 – J.N. S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
