Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DEEPA SHARMA, CJ, SUBHASH CHANDRA, J
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RATNESH KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. irregularity in notification did not invalidate claim. (Para 1 , 1 , 2) |
| 2. district forum findings upheld; insurer's reason invalid. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. limits of revisional jurisdiction. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. delay doesn't negate investigated claim validity. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final dismissal due to meritless revision. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. The present revision petition has been filed by Insurance co. against the Order dated 06.10.2016 of the State Commission in appeal no. 681/2016 whereby the appeal of the petitioner insurance co. was dismissed. The appeal was filed by the insurance co. against the order dated 03.03.2016 of the District Forum in Complaint No. 46/2014 whereby the complaint was allowed and following directions were issued:
……, the opposite party has repudiated the claim unfairly and without any basis which caused deficiency in service. Therefore, the complaint is acceptable.
Order
The Complaint is accepted against the opposite party insurance company and the insurance company is directed to pay the insured value of the tractor to the complainant which shall be payable within 30 days from this order. The complainant shall be entitled to get the interest @ 9% per annum on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
