SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 59

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JAY GIRH NIRMAN PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ARUNODAY APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: MR. RAKESH MISHRA
For the Respondent:

ORDER

D.K. JAIN, J., PRESIDENT

This revision petition under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) has been preferred by the opposite party in the Consumer Complaint (D.F. Case No. 180 of 2006) against order dated Sept.9, 2008 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal (for short “the State Commission”) in first appeal (SC Case No. FA/08/237), whereby the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Alipore (for short “the District Forum”) dismissing the aforesaid complaint has been reversed and the complaint has been allowed with consequential reliefs.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to this petition are as follows:

In August 1981, by three separate registered Deeds of Conveyance, the three original owners of the subject land transferred their undivided 1/3rd share each to one Jupitor Drug Company, which in turn, entered into an agreement dated Aug.23, 1988 with the petitioner, for development of the land by constructing flats, etc.. Flats with car parking area in the basement, one assembly hall on one side and one maintenance area on the other side of the ground floor of the building were cons

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top