Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
A. P. Sahi, PRESIDENT, Dr. Inder Jit Singh, MEMBER
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
RACHNA MANTRI & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of dispute regarding plot provision. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding contractual obligations and consumer rights. (Para 8) |
| 3. judicial findings affirming consumer rights and obligations. (Para 9 , 12) |
| 4. final ruling dismissing the appeal. (Para 10 , 13) |
ORDER
1. The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioners against Respondents as detailed above, under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 08.02.2022 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 14 of 2014 in which order dated 25.09.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Indore (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 1255 of 2012 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 08.02.2022 of the State Commission.
2. While the Revision Petitioner was Appellant before the State Commission and Respondent No. 2 before the District Forum, Respondent No. 1 was Respondent No. 1 before the State Commission and Complainant before the District Forum and Respondent No. 2 was Respondent No. 2 befo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
