Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE V.K. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUKHMAL JAIN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over payment plan discrepancies and cancellation of plot allotments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. preliminary objections raised regarding jurisdiction and speculation. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 3. district forum's jurisdiction validated; consumer rights emphasized. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. decision on entitlement to possession and interest payments. (Para 12) |
| 5. final ruling on payments and possession delivery mechanism. (Para 13) |
The complainants/respondents booked residential plots with the petitioner company in a project, namely, ‘TDI City’, which the petitioner company is developing in Kundli in Haryana. Allotment letters were issued to the complainants pursuant to the bookings made by them. The price of each plot was agreed at about 17 lakhs. The complainants were also required to pay External Development Charges in addition to the price of the plot. The said External Development Charges had not been ascertained by the time the allotments were made to the complainants. The allotment letters came to be issued to the complainants on 7.1.2006. The payment plan was incorporated in Schedule-1 annexed to the application whereby the bookings were made.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
