Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
R.K. AGRAWAL, S.M. KANTIKAR, JJ
M/S. HUBTOWN LTD. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
VIMAL BHANNUDAS VARAK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer protection act claims by slum dwellers. (Para 1 , 21) |
| 2. jurisdiction issues of consumer forum. (Para 10 , 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. ratios on consumer definitions and remedies. (Para 16 , 18) |
| 4. liability of builders in slum redevelopment. (Para 22 , 24) |
| 5. dismissal of revision petitions due to meritless claims. (Para 25) |
ORDER
1. The present batch of the Revision Petitions under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), has been filed by the Petitioners/Opposite Parties in the Complaint before the District Forum, assailing the Common Order dated 12.10.2018, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Mumbai (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal Nos. A/15/1001 to A/15/1031. By the impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed all the First Appeals preferred by the Petitioners/Opposite Parties against the Common Order dated 30.04.2015 passed by the Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum, Mumbai Sub-Urban District (for short, “the District Forum”) in Complaint Nos. 08/2009 to 38/2009 and upheld Order of the District Forum. By the said Order, the District Forum while partly allowing the Complai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
