Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. R.K. AGRAWAL, President, DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, Member
M/S. HUBTOWN LTD. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
VIMAL BHANNUDAS VARAK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the case and initial facts. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioners’ reconsiderations of the appeals against prior orders. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. petitioners' arguments against consumer categorization. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court's insight aligning prior case law to present case. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. final determination of consumer rights and contractor responsibilities. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. restating the obligations of the service provider under the consumer act. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. summary dismissal of revision petitions. (Para 25) |
ORDER
1. The present batch of the Revision Petitions under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 (for short “the Act”), has been filed by the Petitioners/Opposite Parties in the Complaint before the District Forum, assailing the Common Order dated 12.10.2018, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Mumbai (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal Nos. A/15/1001 to A/15/1031. By the impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed all the First Appeals preferred by the Petitioners/Opposite Parties against the Common Order dated 30.04.2015 passed by the Consumer Grievances Red
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
