Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MRS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA, PRESIDING MEMBER
MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
VIKAS KHATTAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaint about vehicle defects leading to service issues. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's rebuttal regarding consumer status and claims. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. limits of revisional jurisdiction in consumer law. (Para 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's reaffirmation of manufacturing defects and evidence assessment. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final decision on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 16) |
The present Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 01.12.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.1341 of 2013 whereby the Appeal of the Petitioner against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum VI, Delhi (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint No.1257 of 2019 was dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the Respondent (hereinafter referred to as “the Complainant”) had purchased a Maruti Wagon R (LPG) car on 19.10.2007 for approximately a sum of ₹4 Lakhs from automobiles dealer. Since according to the Complainant, the car was giving problem just after running 1610 kms, he had to take the car repeatedly to the workshop. As per the Complainant, the car had been ta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
