Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. INDER JIT SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER
CARE HEALTH INSURANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RELIGARE HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.) & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
HARJINDER SINGH SOHAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the revision petition against prior orders (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary of the complainant's situation and insurer's actions (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments concerning the duty of disclosure and insurer's failure to clarify (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court findings on disclosure obligations and claim rejection (Para 8 , 9) |
1. The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner(s) against Respondent as detailed above, under section 58(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the order dated 04.04.2022 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 49/2021 in which order dated 16.06.2021, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as District Commission) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no. 598/2019 was challenged, inter alia praying to set aside the order passed by the State Commission.
2. While the Revision Petitioner(s) (hereinafter also referred to as OPs) were Respondents before the State Commission and OPs before the District Forum, the Respondent (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
