Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
C. Viswanath, PM, Justice Ram Surat Ram Maurya, M
M/S GIGEO REAL ESTATE, THROUGH ITS PROP. CHHAGANLAL KUNWARJBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SHAKUNTALALA PRAKASH CHOUDHARI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in substitution applications (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. requirements for application servicing (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal framework for delay condonation (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling on appeal (Para 9) |
1. Heard Mr. Chaitanya G Barapatre, Advocate, for the petitioner.
2. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Circuit Bench at Nagpur dated 20.12.2019 and 07.01.2021 passed in First Appeal No. A/15/178 of 2015 (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur dated 25.02.2014, passed in Consumer Complaint No.633 of 2012) whereby State Commission has rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing the application for setting aside abatement and substituting the heirs of Smt. Shakuntala Prakash Choudhari (sole respondent) and dismissed the appeal as abated.
3. Smt. Shakuntala Prakash Choudhari (the respondent) filed Consumer Complaint No. 633/2012, for directing the petitioner to deliver possession of (i) flat No. 33 (admeasuring 550 Sq.ft.), at third floor of the building E-6 (ii) flat No. T-52 (admeasuring 825 sq.ft.), at 5th floor, in the building named as To
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
