Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA, PRESIDING MEMBER
SKODA AUTO VOLKSWAGEN INDIA P LTD – Appellant
Versus
MEGHANA CORPORATES P LIMITED & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of consumer complaint and defects. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments by manufacturer denying consumer status and defect. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's observations on service history and evidence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. ruling on merits and legal standards for conclusion. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. evidence establishes defects within warranty period. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. concurrent findings by lower courts deemed valid. (Para 22 , 24) |
The present Revision Petition under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) is filed challenging the order dated 23.09.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karnataka (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.2161 of 2011 whereby the order dated 07.06.2011 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bangalore (for short “the District Forum”) in CC/591/2012 was confirmed and the Appeal was dismissed.
2. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner, Opposite Party No.2 in the original complaint, alleging that the order of the Foras below needs to be set aside as it suffers with illegality and infirmi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
