NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
TATA MOTORS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
HARPREET SINGH & ANR. – Respondent
ORDER
DR. INDER JIT SINGH, MEMBER
1. The present Revision Petitions have been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under section 58 (1) (b) of Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the common order dated 21.03.2022 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 719 and 486 of 2014 in which order dated 09.04.2014 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, Qutub Industrial Area (hereinafter referred to as District Commission) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no 1039 of 2005 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 21.03.2022 of the State Commission.
2. Notice was issued to the Respondents. Petitioner filed Written Arguments/Synopsis on 10.07.2024 and respondent no.1 filed Written Arguments / Synopsis on 18.07.2024 respectively.
3. Brief facts of the case as presented by the Complainant as emerged from the RP, Order of the State Commission, Order of the District Commission and other case records are that on 14.05.2004, Complainant, namely, Harpreet Singh purchased a new Car make TATA Indica V2 for a sum of Rs.3,71,418/- m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.