Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. INDER JIT SINGH, Presiding Member
MAHIPAL CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
MAX BUPA HEALTH INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeal and the parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. summary of facts leading to the complaint. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding claim repudiation. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's observations on claim handling and disclosures. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final judgment and restoration of initial claim decision. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER
1. The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 10.10.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 302/2017 in which order dated 04.01.2017 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 1566/2014 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order passed by the State Commission in FA/302/2017.
2. The Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent before the State Commission and Complainant before the District Forum and the Respondents (hereinafter al
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
