ORDER

1.       The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioners against Respondent as detailed above, under section 58 (1) (b)  of Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the order dated 24.08.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 1745 of 2015 in which order dated 25.07.2015 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Varanasi (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no. 06 of 2014 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 24.08.2021 of the State Commission.

2.       While the Revision Petitioners (hereinafter also referred to as OPs ) were Appellants and the Respondent (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent in the said FA No. 1745 of 2015 before the State Commission, the Revision Petitioners were OPs and Respondent was Complainant before the District Forum in the CC no. 06 of 2014.

3.       Notice was issued to the Respondents on 06.04.2022. Parties filed Written Arguments/Synopsis on 12.07.2023 and 24.02.2023 respectively.

4.       Brief facts of the case, as emerged from the RP, Order of the State Commission, Order of the District Forum and other case records are that Complainant is a consumer of electricity connection no. 295121 and account no. 1087521 was allotted to him.  Newly constructed shops are located on the ground floor in the building of the complainant in which all the tenants pay the electricity bill having electricity meter in their own name.  The family of the complainant lives in seven rooms located on the first and second floor of the house and in seven other rooms, the complainant runs a Dharamshala, namely, ‘Prakash Guest House ‘and receives a little donation from the pilgrims in lieu of accommodation.  The complainant increased the power load of 7 kw electricity in  his premises on his own and kept paying the bills regularly.  On 06.07.2011, the old electricity meter installed in the premises of the complainant was changed to new meter bearing number 5242  and the bill of Rs.1,32,200/- sent to him on the basis of the meter reading on the above connection was paid.  After that, wrong bills of Rs.1,27,242/- of different dates were sent to him by the Petitioner and Petitioner did not adjust the amount of Rs.1,32,200/- which he  had already deposited.  Being aggrieved of this, the Complainant filed the CC before the District Forum and the District Commission vide order dated 25.07.2015 partly allowed the CC.  Aggrieved by the decision of the District Forum, the OPs filed an Appeal before the State Commission which was dismissed.   Hence the OPs are before this Commission now in the present RP.

5.       Petitioners have challenged the said Order dated 24.08.2021 of the State Commission mainly on following grounds:

6.       Heard counsels of both sides.  Contentions/pleas of the parties on various issues raised in the RP, Written Arguments, and Oral Arguments advanced during the hearing, are summed up below.

6.1. Counsel for the Petitioner repeated the points which are stated in para 5, grounds for challenging the order of the State Commission, hence the same are not being repeated here

6.2     Counsel for the respondent argued that there are concurrent findings of the Fora below and revisional powers of the National Commission can be exercised only if there is there is some prima facie jurisdictional error in the impugned order.  Reliance has  been placed on the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s Ruby Chandra Dutta Vs. M/s United India Insurance Company ( 2011) AIR ( SCW) 2311 : 2011 ( 3) JT 586.

6.3.    Counsel further argued that respondent is  occupying 7 rooms for residential purpose for himself and his family in the first and second floor of the premises where the electricity connection is installed and that respondent also runs a Dharamshala and provides accommodation to the pilgrims w