NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PRAJAKTA PRADEEP MULAY – Appellant
Versus
VINOD GOYAL – Respondent
ORDER
1. The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent as detailed above, under section 21 of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 05.06.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Maharashtra (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.A/2015/438 in which order dated 19.01.2015 of Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Mumbai Suburban District (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no. 21 of 2010 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 19.01.2015 of the District Forum.
2. The Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Appellant before the State Commission and Complainant before the District Forum. The Respondent (hereinafter also referred to as OP) was Respondent before the State Commission and OP before the District Forum. Notice was issued to the Respondent. Parties filed Written Arguments/Synopsis on 02.12.2022
3. Brief facts of the case, as emerged from the RP, Order of the State Commission, Order of the District Forum and other case records are that com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.