SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
CONSUMER CASE NO. 14 OF 2004
 
1. SENIOR CITIZAN HOME COMPLEX SOCIETY APARTMENT OWNER
SOCIETY APRTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION
GREATER NOIDA
U.P.
2. .
.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus 
1. SENIOR CITIZAN HOME WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS.
8 OLD MUSSOORIE ROAD,
DEHRADUN
2. Chief Executive Officer,
GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GNIDA), 169, CHITWAN ESTATE, SECTOR GAMMA,
GREATER NOIDA
U.P. 201 306.
3. -
-
...........Opp.Party(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DINESH SINGH,PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE,MEMBER

For the Complainant :
Mr. Aviral Saxena, Advocate
(in physical hearing)
For the Applicants in I.A. Nos.2424/2021 & 10900/2021 and
No. 8679/2021 : Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp.Party :
For the Opposite Party No. 1 : Mr. U.K. Saxena, Senior Advocate
Assisted by Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal,
Advocate
For the Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party No. 3 to 6: Ex parte (vide Order dated 13.09.2005)

Dated : 07 Feb 2022
ORDER

1.       Heard the learned counsel.

2.       Lear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top