SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
CONSUMER CASE NO. 155 OF 2001
 
1. DR. REBA MODAK & ANR.
W/O SH. GIRIJA SANKAR MODAK
R/O FLAT NO. 3D DD/53
NARAYANTOLA E CALCUTTA - 700059
...........Complainant(s)
Versus 
1. SANKARA NETHRALAYA & ORS.
UNIT OF MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION
18 COLLEGE ROAD
CHENNAI - 600006
...........Opp.Party(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL,PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. BINOY KUMAR,MEMBER

For the Complainant :
Appeared at the time of arguments
For the Complainants : Mr. Partha Sil, Advocate
Mr. Soumya Dutta, Advocate
Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Advocate
Mr. G. S. Modak, Complainant No. 2 in person
For the Opp.Party :
Appeared at the time of arguments
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Advocate
Mr. S. Gurukrishna Kumar, Advocate
Mr. S. Hari Haran, Advocate
Mr. Arvindh Gupa, Advocate a/w
Dr. Kannan, Anesthetist (in person)

Dated : 26 Aug 2022
ORDER

Pronounced on:  26th August  2022

ORDER

DR. S. M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER

Complaint:

1.     The Complainants Dr. Reba Modak and her husband Girija Sankar Modak are the parents of deceased son Master Anamitra Modak. The Opposite Parties are Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai (OP-1), Dr. T. S. Surendran (OP-2) and Dr. R. Kanan (OP-3) the Anesthetist. The Complaint was filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the parents of deceased for alleged gross medical negligence and deficiency in service causing death of their only child during surgery for squint correction.

2.     The Complainants’ son Anmitra, about 6 years of age (hereinafter referred to as the ‘patient’) for his squint eyes was taken to Chennai at Sankara Nethralaya (hereinafter referred to as the ‘OP-1 - Hospital’). Dr. (Mrs.) S. Agarkar examined the child on 12.06.2000 and advised minor surgery to correct the squint. She proposed the name of Senior Surgeon - Dr. T. S. Surendran for the operation to be done on 14.06.2000.  The preoperative investigations, blood and urine tests were conducted. On 13.06.2000, Dr. Sujatha clinically examined the child and noticed faint functional systolic ‘murmur’   and chest wall abnormality. The same was brought to the notice of Dr. S. Bhaskaran, a Senior Cardiologist, who further examined the child with some exercises and concluded about no murmur and he also ruled out further need for any tests like ECG, ECHO or Chest X-ray etc. He declared the child “Fit for General Anesthesia”. The surgery was fixed on 14.06.2000. As advised, the Complainants took their child on empty stomach to the hospital at 9.00 a.m., but the bed to the child was allotted at around 2.00 p.m. The child was administered three injections and at about 3.00 p.m., he was taken to Operation Theatre. At about 6.00 p.m. the Complainants were given shocking news by Dr. J. Biswas that their child expired on the operation table. It was further alleged that the hospital issued patient’s case summary after two days i.e. on 16.06.2000. The discharge summary was vague without details of Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and the happenings in the operation theatre. Despite repeated requests, the OPs failed to provide complete medical record. Therefore, they approached the Prime Minister’s Office and, finally after six months (11.12.2000) entire medical record including Post mortem report was handed to the Complainants.

3.     The Complainants further alleged that there was excessive gap between the last oral intake and commencement of the surgery. The patient was fed at 6 a.m. with just two biscuits and juice but, he was taken to OT at 3.00 p.m.  Thus, the child was kept on fasting for 9 hours 20 minutes, due to which he became hypoglycemic, which could lead to cardiac arrest. Halothane was used as an anesthetic agent which was known to cause bradycardia (heart rate slows down). Atropine was given as a pre-medication in all the cases to prevent bradycardia. The timing and dose of injection atropine is very important to prevent End


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top