SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
CONSUMER CASE NO. 89 OF 1995
 
1. VIRENDER KHULLAR
BABUSHA INTERNATIONAL
A-31,NARAYANA INDUSTRAIL AREA
PHASE-II NEW DELHI
...........Complainant(s)
Versus 
1. AMERICAN CONSOLIDATION SERVICES LTD.
311-A-315,INTERNATIONAL TRADE TOWER
NEHRU PLACE
NEW DELHI
2. CENTRAL FIDELITY BANK
Richmond
VA
3. ZIP CODE
2615, Elmhurst Lane, Portsmouth
VA - 23701
U.S.A.
4. HOEGH LINES
Leif Hoegh & Co., A/S Oslo
Norway
...........Opp.Party(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. S. K. NAIK, MEMBER

For the Complainant :
Mr. H.L. Tiku, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Yashmeet Kaur, Advocate
For the Opp.Party :
Mr. Sumit Goel, Advocate with
Ms. Suman Yadav, Advocate
for O.P. 1
Mr. Arvind Varma, Sr. Counsel with Mr. G. Durga Bose, Advocate and Mr. Dipendra, Advocate for O.P. No. 2

Dated : 22 Mar 2012
ORDER

PER JUSTICE R.C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER

 

 

ORDER

 

          As the facts and questions of law involved in both these original petitions are similar, we propose to deal and decide both these complaints by means of this common order.

2.      Original Petition No. 89 of 1995 has been filed by Mr. Virender Khullar in the capacity


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top